Judicial Protection in the European Union
Informacje ogólne
Kod przedmiotu: | 2200-1I110-ERA |
Kod Erasmus / ISCED: | (brak danych) / (brak danych) |
Nazwa przedmiotu: | Judicial Protection in the European Union |
Jednostka: | Wydział Prawa i Administracji |
Grupy: |
Erasmus+ |
Punkty ECTS i inne: |
4.00
|
Język prowadzenia: | angielski |
Rodzaj przedmiotu: | fakultatywne |
Tryb prowadzenia: | w sali |
Skrócony opis: |
This course will examine the system of judicial protection established by the EU Treaties and will focus on the role of the Court of Justice of the EU in developing the constitutional character of the EU. It will provide an overview of the relationship between the CJEU and national courts, and how judicial relations have been affected by case law in recent years from the CJEU, the European Court of Human Rights as well as national courts, particularly relating to the EU value of the rule of law and the consideration of EU obligations based on mutual trust. |
Pełny opis: |
The European Court of Justice has always played a central role in shaping the relationship between EU and national law, most frequently as a result of dialogue with national courts when they are applying EU law. This has given rise to the development of structural constitutional principles such as direct effect, supremacy and mutual trust. In recent years, case law relating to the rule of law and judicial independence has led to the development of a body of EU law dealing with judicial independence as an essential prerequisite for a functioning EU legal order. The structural (systemic) protection of fundamental rights at the EU level, under the ECHR and at the national level has been a critical factor in these developments. This course will provide students with insights into the following areas: 1. The role of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the concept of national procedural autonomy 2. The relationship between the CJEU and national courts 3. Primacy of EU law and national constitutional identity under Art. 4(2) TEU 4. Effective judicial protection and remedies for breaches of EU law 5. The autonomy of the EU legal order and risks posed by international courts and investment tribunals (ISDS) 6. The scope of the principle of mutual trust in EU law 7. The principle of mutual trust as a horizontal obligation of Member States 8. The protection of fundamental rights in the EU 1: European fundamental rights protection 9. The protection of fundamental rights in the EU 2: The protection of fundamental rights under the ECHR system 10. The values of the EU in Art. 2 TEU 1: the value of rule of law as given expression in Art. 19 TEU, and judicial independence in EU law 11. The values of the EU in Art. 2 TEU 2: the added value of the values in Art. 2 TEU and their justiciability 12. The EU budget and the rule of law conditionality mechanism 13. The Art. 2 TEU implications for the restoration of the rule of law in a Member State |
Literatura: |
Preferred reading list: Stephen Weatherill, Law and Values in the European Union (Oxford, 2016; online edn, Oxford Academic, 18 Aug. 2016) Petra Bárd, ‘In courts we trust, or should we? Judicial independence as the precondition for the effectiveness of EU law’, (2022) European Law Journal, 1-26 Ana Bobić, ‘Constructive Versus Destructive Conflict: Taking Stock of the Recent Constitutional Jurisprudence in the EU’, Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 22 (2020), 60-84 Koen Lenaerts, ‘La vie après l'avis: Exploring the principle of mutual (yet not blind) trust’, Common Market Law Review, Volume 54, Issue 3 (2017) pp. 805 – 840 Jed Odermatt, ‘Is EU Law International? Case C-741/19 Republic of Moldova v Komstroy LLC and the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order’, European Papers, Vol. 6, 2021, No 3, 1255- 1268 Ruairi O’Neill, 'National constitutional identity as a tool for protecting the autonomy of the EU legal order', Common Market Law Review, Vol. 60(5), 2023, 1453-1474 Ruairi O’Neill, 'Effet Utile and the (re)Organisation of National Judiciaries', European Law Journal, 2021, 27(1-3), 240-261 Cecilia Rizcallah, ‘The Systemic Equivalence Test and the Presumption of Equivalent Protection in European Human Rights Law—A Critical Appraisal’, German Law Journal (2023), 24, pp. 1062–1077 Orlando Scarcello, ‘Effective judicial protection and procedural autonomy beyond rule of law judgments: Randstad Italia’, Common Market Law Review, Volume 59, Issue 5 (2022) pp. 1445 – 1464 Armin von Bogdandy and Luke Dimitrios Spieker, ‘EU Values as Constraints and Facilitators in Democratic Transitions’, in Bobek, Bodnar et. al., Transition 2.0: Re- establishing Constitutional Democracy in EU Member States, 320, Nomos, (Baden-Baden 2023), 113-142 |
Efekty uczenia się: |
Learning Outcomes: this course aims to provide students with advanced knowledge about the major mechanisms of judicial protection in the European Union and their impact on national legal systems. |
Metody i kryteria oceniania: |
Grading |
Zajęcia w cyklu "Semestr letni 2023/24" (zakończony)
Okres: | 2024-02-19 - 2024-06-16 |
Przejdź do planu
PN WT ŚR CZ PT |
Typ zajęć: |
Konwersatorium, 30 godzin
|
|
Koordynatorzy: | Ruairi O'Neill, Willie Odogwu, Stephen Terrett | |
Prowadzący grup: | Ruairi O'Neill | |
Lista studentów: | (nie masz dostępu) | |
Zaliczenie: | Zaliczenie na ocenę |
Zajęcia w cyklu "Semestr zimowy 2024/25" (w trakcie)
Okres: | 2024-10-01 - 2025-01-26 |
Przejdź do planu
PN WT ŚR KON
CZ PT |
Typ zajęć: |
Konwersatorium, 30 godzin
|
|
Koordynatorzy: | Ruairi O'Neill, Willie Odogwu, Stephen Terrett | |
Prowadzący grup: | Ruairi O'Neill | |
Lista studentów: | (nie masz dostępu) | |
Zaliczenie: | Zaliczenie na ocenę |
Właścicielem praw autorskich jest Uniwersytet Warszawski.